Ode on a grecian urn essays

           “Ode to a Grecian Urn” is formed up on a chain of paradoxes and contrasts. Keats decorated the poem by dissimilarity between the stationary figures on the urn and dynamic life, depicted on it; soul, variable and eternal, stable; life and art. And indeed, the author does not give answers, who these young men actually are – gods or mortals, and where this place is located – in the mountains or on the coast. Specific details are shown in the form of questions, from what their reality is combined with a certain mystery. A few poems can generate so many conflicting views as “Ode to a Grecian Urn.” 

[V]iewed through the lenses of period style, Ingres's portrait . . make[s] us wallow in a plum-pudding richness of textures, materials, patterns that aspire to an airless density. Mme. Moitessier, of course, is a model of cool propriety in her wealthy Paris interior, and her posture alludes to classical prototypes; but she and Ingres clearly revel in her sumptuous inventory of possessions: the gilt console, the tufted damask sofa, the Chinese vase, the peacock-feathered fan, the bracelets and brooch with their enormous gems, and above all the full cascade of the rose-patterned silk dress with its embellishments of fringes and ribbons. But Ingres . . transcends the Second Empire period look through his own genius, which here ennobles the sitter not only with the abstract, yet sensual linear circuits that command the undulant shapes of fingers, shoulders, and arms, but through an adaptation of the common antique pose of contemplative head-on-hand . .. 16

Ode on a grecian urn essays

ode on a grecian urn essays


ode on a grecian urn essaysode on a grecian urn essaysode on a grecian urn essaysode on a grecian urn essays